“你在廣播中稱瑪麗亞·莎拉波娃是騙子非常高興”——克里斯·埃弗特在第二次興奮劑指控中支持西蒙娜·哈勒普，網球迷大喊虛偽
網球迷批評克里斯埃弗特在 2016 年對瑪麗亞莎拉波娃興奮劑醜聞的反應與她最近對西蒙娜哈勒普第二次興奮劑違規的立場截然不同。
5 月 19 日星期五，國際網球誠信機構 (ITIA) 指控哈勒普第二次使用興奮劑，“涉及她運動員生物護照中的違規行為”，這是對她去年的指控的補充。自 2022 年 10 月以來，羅馬尼亞人在美國公開賽上檢測出違禁物質 Roxadustat 呈陽性後，已被臨時停賽。
當一位粉絲在社交媒體上詢問她對此事的看法時，埃弗特表達了她對哈勒普的支持，並對這位兩屆大滿貫冠軍故意服用提高成績的藥物表示懷疑。
“我很難相信西蒙娜會故意使用 PED 的……”埃弗特在推特上寫道。
It’s very hard for me to believe Simona would intentionally use PED’s…. https://t.co/oLr5ibg5bv
— Chris Evert (@ChrissieEvert) May 20, 2023
然而，早在 2016 年，前世界第一對瑪麗亞·莎拉波娃 (Maria Sharapova) 米曲肼檢測呈陽性的反應就截然不同了。
“當她說你知道我從 16 歲開始就一直服用它時，她發出了一些混合信號，因為你知道我的家人患有糖尿病。那麼 Sugarpova 呢，我的意思是她認可有點利益衝突的糖果，”Evert 在與 Lance Armstrong 的“The Forward Podcast”中說道。
與莎拉波娃相比，一些網球迷批評埃弗特對哈勒普興奮劑醜聞的反應明顯虛偽。
“讓我們至少保持一致，克麗絲。你非常樂意在廣播和播客中稱瑪麗亞是騙子。請注意，米屈肼從未被證明是真正的 PED，即使經過了這麼多年。但這對你來說太不可思議了？”一位粉絲評論道。
let’s at least be consistent, chrissie. You were more than happy to go on air and podcasts calling Maria a liar. Mind you, meldonium was never even proven as a true PED, even after all these years. Yet this is so unbelievable to you?
— m (@Masha4Lyfe) May 20, 2023
“有趣的是，當莎拉波娃承認自己的錯誤時，你如何全力以赴。但在這里為西蒙娜辯護，她被發現在她的生物護照上撒謊。慢拍。但是你做你。暴露你的虛偽，”一位用戶發推文說。
Funny how u went all in against sharapova when she admitted her mistake. But defending simona here who got caught lying about her biological passport. Slow claps. But u do you. Expose your hypocrisy
— JB (@Brar_JSB) May 20, 2023
許多球迷還聲稱，雖然哈勒普被免於懷疑，但莎拉波娃卻沒有受到同樣的禮遇。
“哈哈，像西蒙娜這樣的人。因此，她得到了懷疑的好處。莎拉波娃？從一開始就被撕成碎片，主要是因為她從來沒有參加過人氣競賽，”另一位粉絲插話道。
Lol, people like Simona. Thus, she gets the benefit of the doubt. Sharapova? ripped to shreds from the get go largely b/c she was never out to win a popularity contest.
— Dylan Streibig (@DoubletoughDyl) May 20, 2023
“這就是 Pova 訴 Simona 的禁毒令之間的區別讓我生氣的地方。即使細節模糊不清，瑪莎也沒有從懷疑中獲益，”另一位粉絲發推文說。
this is what pisses me off about the difference between Pova v. Simona's drug bans. Masha did not get the benefit of the doubt even when the details were hazy https://t.co/pVVfjCHjyu
— Matt (@kvitarenka) May 20, 2023
以下是粉絲對Chris Evert的推文的更多反應：
Not saying she's guilty, but, do we really know anyone? Anyway, I thought the #Wimbledon win was especially dominant, completely out of character for that surface, recall being shocked how well she played (and not because I'm a fan of Serena's..) 😑
— ULTM8SerenaWilliamsf (@ultm8swfans) May 20, 2023
You’ve never been one to exercise fair judgement across the board so I’m not surprised by this. https://t.co/wHbFwT3R0A
— Mpumelelo (@mpumelelopn) May 20, 2023
What exactly do you want us to say to this? And if you think she wouldn't intentionally use, that means there are players that you think the opposite. So who are they, Christine? Say their names or keep it on the playground. https://t.co/lWIa40Aawn
— Crinkum-Crankum (@ChimGAT) May 20, 2023
still find this take from her hilarious, all things considered https://t.co/Dz0h0lJxTb
— m (@Masha4Lyfe) May 20, 2023
I feel the same way about Maria Sharapova. She was ripped to shreds.
— Donnie Welborn (@WelbornDonnie) May 20, 2023
Not Simona but YES Maria? Hipocresy
— Cristina De Juan (@CristinaDeJua10) May 20, 2023
網球記者說，西蒙娜·哈勒普面臨比瑪麗亞·莎拉波娃“更嚴重的聯賽”指控
網球記者本·羅森博格分享了他對西蒙娜·哈勒普第二次興奮劑指控的看法，他表示羅馬尼亞人的指控代表了世界第一面臨的最嚴厲指控。他認為這些指控比對瑪麗亞·莎拉波娃的指控“更嚴重” 。
“西蒙娜·哈勒普 (Simona Halep) 仍將有機會上訴並宣稱自己清白，我們將了解更多有關第二次指控的信息，但值得一提的是，這些指控是所有排名第一的網球運動員面臨的最嚴厲的興奮劑指控。比莎拉波娃更嚴肅的聯賽，”羅森伯格在推特上寫道。
Simona Halep still will get her chance to appeal and profess her innocence, and we will find out more about this second charge, but it’s worth putting in context that these are the most severe doping charges any #1 tennis player has faced.
Leagues more serious than Sharapova. https://t.co/fd6n9vhsxW
— Ben Rothenberg (@BenRothenberg) May 19, 2023
發佈留言